Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Gastroenterol. hepatol. (Ed. impr.) ; 43(3): 142-154, mar. 2020. graf, tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-190791

RESUMO

Post-operative morbidity of pancreatectomies occurs in up to 40-50% of patients, even in modern series. There is a need to find a simple scale in order to identify patients with increased risk of developing major post-operative complications after pancreatic resections. Many studies have been published on sarcopenia and surgical outcomes. Aspects of sarcopenia are presented, along with a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines, in order to search for articles about sarcopenia and pancreatic surgery. The impact of sarcopenia on morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections is still unclear. The studies presented have been carried out over long periods of time, and many of them compare patients with different diseases. There are also different definitions of sarcopenia, and this can influence the results, as some of the reviewed articles have already shown. It is necessary to unify criteria, both in the definition and in the cut-off values. Prospective studies and consensus on sarcopenia diagnosis should be achieved


La morbilidad postoperatoria de las pancreatectomías alcanza hasta el 40-50% de los pacientes, incluso en series modernas. Es necesaria una escala simple, capaz de identificar a los pacientes con mayor riesgo de desarrollar complicaciones postoperatorias después de las resecciones pancreáticas. Se han publicado múltiples estudios sobre sarcopenia y resultados quirúrgicos. En este trabajo revisamos aspectos sobre la sarcopenia, realizando una revisión sistemática, de acuerdo con las guías PRISMA, buscando artículos sobre sarcopenia y cirugía pancreática. El impacto de la sarcopenia en la morbimortalidad tras pancreatectomías aún no está claro. Los estudios presentados se han llevado a cabo en largos períodos de tiempo, muchos de ellos comparan pacientes con diferentes enfermedades. Además, la definición de sarcopenia es variada, pudiendo influir en los resultados como ya demuestran algunos de los artículos revisados. Deben realizarse estudios prospectivos, siendo necesario también unificar criterios en la definición y puntos de corte de la sarcopenia


Assuntos
Humanos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sarcopenia/epidemiologia , Pancreatectomia/métodos , Indicadores de Morbimortalidade , Sarcopenia/complicações , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Pancreatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiologia
3.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 43(3): 142-154, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32089375

RESUMO

Post-operative morbidity of pancreatectomies occurs in up to 40-50% of patients, even in modern series. There is a need to find a simple scale in order to identify patients with increased risk of developing major post-operative complications after pancreatic resections. Many studies have been published on sarcopenia and surgical outcomes. Aspects of sarcopenia are presented, along with a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines, in order to search for articles about sarcopenia and pancreatic surgery. The impact of sarcopenia on morbidity and mortality in pancreatic resections is still unclear. The studies presented have been carried out over long periods of time, and many of them compare patients with different diseases. There are also different definitions of sarcopenia, and this can influence the results, as some of the reviewed articles have already shown. It is necessary to unify criteria, both in the definition and in the cut-off values. Prospective studies and consensus on sarcopenia diagnosis should be achieved.


Assuntos
Pancreatectomia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Sarcopenia/complicações , Terapia Combinada , Proteínas na Dieta/uso terapêutico , Terapia por Exercício , Humanos , Desnutrição/complicações , Músculo Esquelético/diagnóstico por imagem , Músculo Esquelético/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Transplante de Pâncreas , Pancreatectomia/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicações , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/mortalidade , Pancreatite Crônica/complicações , Pancreatite Crônica/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Risco , Sarcopenia/diagnóstico por imagem , Sarcopenia/patologia , Sarcopenia/terapia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
5.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 275(3): 659-669, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29209851

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is traditionally deemed to be successful if serum calcium levels return to normal 6 months after parathyroidectomy. Regular monitoring of serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the follow-up of patients after parathyroidectomy for PHPT has drawn attention to the presence of a normocalcemic group of patients with elevated PTH (NCePTH) during the post-operative period. The etiological factors and mechanisms underlying this condition, its consequences, and the possibility of treatment are the object of this study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an unlimited PubMed search updated on March 31, 2017, which yielded 1628 results. We selected 37 articles, 33 of which included cases of NCePTH in their series and 23 performed statistical studies to assess factors associated with NCePTH. RESULTS: The maximum mean prevalence of NCePTH in the various series was 23.5%, ranging from 3 to 46%. Many factors were associated with NCePTH. The most important were higher pre-operative PTH, low pre-operative 25 (OH) D3, lower pre-operative creatinine clearance and greater adenoma weight. The origin of NCePTH may be multifactorial, since several factors were implicated in the etiology. NCePTH does not seem to be related to an increase in PHPT recurrence, although this possibility should not be dismissed. Vitamin D deficiency should be corrected. Treatment with calcium supplements seems to be clearly beneficial. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of NCePTH is high. The causes of secondary hyperparathyroidism should be investigated carefully. Patients require treatment and long-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/sangue , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/cirurgia , Hormônio Paratireóideo/sangue , Paratireoidectomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Adenoma/complicações , Adenoma/cirurgia , Calcifediol/sangue , Cálcio/sangue , Humanos , Hiperparatireoidismo Primário/etiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/complicações , Neoplasias das Paratireoides/cirurgia , Deficiência de Vitamina D/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...